CivitasOS

CIVITASOS / COLLECTION IN PROGRESSCIVITASOS / 文集整理中

Institutional essays.制度文集

Power, trust, collective intelligence, and how institutions learn.关于权力、信任、群体智慧,以及制度如何学习。

The collection is being assembled and revised one essay at a time. The reading available today is the working white paper; the sections below describe the collection's planned scope.文集正在逐篇整理与修订。目前可阅读的是工作白皮书;下方各辑列出拟整理的范围。

AVAILABLE TO READ现在可以阅读

A Correctable Civilization — Working White Paper《可纠错的文明》工作白皮书

Read the paper →阅读白皮书 →

Public working draft · Version 0.3 · 8 September 2026 · English / 中文公开工作稿 · 版本 0.3 · 2026年9月8日 · 中英文

The collection文集目录

Planned sections · Essays awaiting editorial review拟定分辑 · 各篇待整理审阅

01Who has the authority to impose consequences?谁有权施加后果?

The burden of justification, participation by affected people, and the limits of war authorization.权力的举证责任、受影响者的参与资格,以及战争授权的边界。

02Who can discover the right answer?谁能发现正确答案?

Minority evidence, collective intelligence, and experiments that allow claims of group superiority to fail.少数意见中的证据、群体智慧,以及允许“群体更强”命题失败的实验。

03Who should hold power—and how should they leave?谁应当掌权,又如何退场?

Leadership, contribution, succession, and the principle that no founder holds a permanent veto.领导力、贡献、权力交接,以及创始人没有永久否决权的原则。

04How do institutions learn?制度如何学习?

Incentives to discover errors, independent review, the reach of corrections, and the costs of reopening decisions.错误发现激励、独立审查、更正的到达率,以及重新开启决定的代价。

05Where might civilization go?文明将走向哪里?

Alternative institutional futures, artificial intelligence, and the limits of claims about inevitable progress.制度未来的不同可能、人工智能,以及“必然进步”论断的边界。

06An atlas of institutional absurdities制度荒谬图鉴

Everyday cases examined through incentives, who benefits, how failures become visible, and testable changes.从日常案例出发,分析激励、受益者、失败如何被看见,以及可检验的改进。

Revision record修订记录

· Collection opened with a six-part outline and a link to the existing working white paper. Individual essays will be added after review.建立六辑目录,接入现有工作白皮书。独立文章将在审阅后逐篇收录。

Ideas belong to no one. Contributions remain traceable.思想无主,贡献有迹。